|
Post by gemwolf on May 7, 2007 6:55:39 GMT -5
The past weekend or so the website www.911truth.org/ has been under attack from hackers. At one stage script has been added to the site, which redirected visitors to another site, www.jewsdidwtc.com/. Currently the message on 911truth.org's home page reads: Welcome to 911Truth.org! Sunday, May 6, 2007 Our apologies: Our site is being persistently, maliciously hacked: We need to spend some time reviewing our security situation...
The big question is naturally who is attacking the site? Is it the Government? If you take a quick glance at the "JewsDidWTC" site, you may for a second think that they're serious. But then if you click for instance on the "Fan Art" link, you'll notice that it's a hate site more than it's another conspiracy site... (Warning, the Fan Art section contains disturbing images! Not recommended for sensitive viewers!) And even more so you'll note that the "copyrights" of the material on the site belongs to Copyright (c) 2003-2007 Gay Nigger Association of America, which sends any credibility down the drain. Is this an actual attack on the 911truth.org site by the Government? Or is it a scam by either of the two sites, seeing that both sites got their names in the news, meaning free hits for both sites... My money is on the latter. I think it's just another pimply-faced hacker seeking much needed attention...
|
|
|
Post by gemwolf on May 7, 2007 7:10:01 GMT -5
Further investigation shows that the "GNAA" is actually quite notorious, and doesn't seem to be connected to any government activity, although it's still not impossible. According to TrendpediaWiki: www.trendpediawiki.com/Gay_Nigger_Association_of_AmericaAll that said, one would think that these sort of people would rather promote "9/11 truth" than sabotage it? I suppose it comes down to "publicity"?
|
|
|
Post by Ceci on May 7, 2007 8:48:31 GMT -5
Gem, I'll have something to say about this news later, but I'd like to point something out first: DisclaimerI know that there will be questions about the name, GNAA, especially when it comes to the sensitivity of some of our members and guests. 1)The usage of the "n-word" in this thread is within the context of the subject matter. 2)The usage of the "n-word" in general speech (such as in a description about a group of people in obscene and defamatory ways) is not right when uttered or written, but please note that in this context it is the name of a group that espouses a particular agenda in terms of its operation. (And yes, there is still a lot of debate about its usage--especially in the Don Imus case and the effects of rap. Probably here, we'll have that debate in the future. ) The usage of "gay" is proper in general speech. However, please keep in mind how the GNAA has used the word in its own context. Ask yourself why they might have used the word "gay" in terms of their name and agenda. 3)And yes, we can converse the group's usage of the term "gay" and "niggers" as a part of GNAA's name intelligently because it has to do with how they are spreading their information as well as their actions. 4)Although nothing is off limits in conversation, please remember to be respectful when dealing with this subject matter especially when thinking about various cultures of people. All of these caveats do not bear any negative reflection on the thread starter. He has plainly stated the subject-matter in its proper context. I am just pointing out a few things to think about when going into this topic. Now please, by all means, continue the conversation. The *small service announcement* is over.
|
|